Thursday, June 23, 2011

The Cambodian vice-consul met with Cambodian citizen accused of spying by Thailand

An official for the Cambodian ministry of Foreign Affairs indicated that the ministry sent the Cambodian vice-consul in Thailand to meet with a Cambodian citizen who was arrested by the Thai authority in Sisaket province.


Following the meeting, it was found that the man was a simple Cambodian citizen who, sometimes, visits Thailand to look for work only. He was not involved with secret spying for Cambodia as he was accused off by the Thai government.

In the afternoon of Saturday 11 June, Koy Kuong, spokesman for the ministry of Foreign Affairs, rejected all accusations [made by Thailand] and said that the Cambodian ministry of Foreign Affairs announced that it categorically rejected [the accusations] because it believe that this is a dishonest invention made by the Thai authority and the Thai PM in order to confuse the public opinion by accusing Cambodia and by lying about the truth.


Koy Kuong added: "The government of Cambodia announced that the invention above is only a subterfuge to foment aggression on Cambodia in the future, and Cambodia regrets that the PM of a neighboring country resorts to adopt lying as his foreign political strategy. Cambodia clearly confirmed that it does not need to do anything to what the Thai PM lied as spying."

The immediate reaction by the Cambodian government took place after Thailand claimed that it arrested 3 men who acted as spies for Cambodia. The three men were arrested in Srol village, located in front of Preah Vihear temple, in the afternoon of 07 June.

On 10 June, the Bangkok Post quoted Thai Colonel Sompoj Khomprang, the police chief in Kantharalak district, Sisaket province, as saying that the Thai authority arrested 32-year-old Suchart Muhamad, a Thai citizen, 43-year-old Ung Kimtai, a Cambodian man, and 37-year-old Nguyen Tengyang, a Vietnamese citizen.

The Thai police indicated that the three were riding a pickup truck and they had maps on them. The three were approaching Thai army bases and large trenches built by the Thai government for use by Thai citizens to protect themselves during clashes. The three also were marking up these locations so they are suspected of involvement with spying for Cambodia.

Phay Siphan, mouthpiece of the Cambodian Council of Ministers, rejected this accusation, saying that, regarding spying activities, Cambodia never sent its agents to spy on Thailand: "The baseless accusation is only an accusation in order to plan for an attack on Cambodia only. The Cambodian individual who was accused of spying, has a proper passport. Thailand accused him of spying, and for this spying he was riding a car to enter inhabited areas, he had a passport and he even had maps."

On 20 June, the Cambodian ministry of Foreign Affairs issued a written statement categorically rejecting the [accusations made by the] Thai PM and the Thai authority, saying that this is an invention to lie to the public opinion in order to create confusion on Cambodia.
11 June 2011
By Hang Savyouth
Radio Free Asia
Translated from Khmer by Khloy Ek


Read more: http://www.khmerarticle.com/2011/06/cambodian-vice-consul-met-with.html#ixzz1QAA6XJsR

Hun Sen to Abhisit: You are STUPID

As long as the court has not proceeded with its work, the person remains innocent. The court has not yet worked on the case – why have you said my people are guilty?” Hun Sen argued. “You are stupid, don’t do it.

Prime Minister Hun Sen lashed out yesterday at the Thai leadership over allegations that a Cambodian arrested in Thailand last week was a spy, saying their rhetoric had shown disregard for judicial procedure.

Speaking at a graduation ceremony of medical students in Phnom Penh, Hun Sen said Thai Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva and his foreign Minister, Kasit Piromya, had repeated the claims against Ung Kimthai – a Cambodian national arrested last week on suspicion of espionage.

“As long as the court has not proceeded with its work, the person remains innocent. The court has not yet worked on the case – why have you said my people are guilty?” Hun Sen argued. “You are stupid, don’t do it.”

Ung Kimthai, 46, was apprehended by Thai authorities on Tuesday last week in Sisaket province, along with nationals from Vietnam and Thailand, on allegations of espionage.

Allegations have also been raised against the Thai national for drunk driving and Ung Kimthai for drug use.

Hun Sen also claimed yesterday that Kasit had expressed desire for a prisoner exchange that could allow the return of two Thai activists who are currently serving time at Prey Sar prison in Phnom Penh for spying, crossing illegally into Cambodia and entering into a military zone.

The premier dismissed talks of such a deal. “There is not any exchange,” Hun Sen said.

“Let the court do its work first – do you respect the independence of the court? You abused the court procedure.”

Thai Patriot Network coordinator Veera Somkwamkid and his secretary, Ratree Pipattanapaiboon, were sentenced to eight and six years, respectively, in February.

Thai government spokesman Panitan Wattanayagorn said yesterday that any questions about a possible prisoner exchange “assume that the case reaches the court”.

He said Thai officials were concentrating on the preliminary stages of the legal process.

“After the case is concluded by the police, they will forward it to the state attorney and he will decide whether the case will be forwarded to the court,” Panitan said. “The legal process has to be done first.”

He mentioned, however, that there was a bilateral agreement in existance between Thailand and Cambodia governing prisoner exchanges in cases that are “similar”.

Panitan also said there had been an “ongoing process of exchanging some of the prisoners in the past year or two”, though he could not provide further detail.

Phnom Penh Post

Saturday, August 28, 2010

GENERAL HISTORY of CAMBODIA

A History of Cambodia

David P. Chandler (1996)

- very brief but good overview of several thousand years of Khmer history

The Tragedy of Cambodian History : Politics, War, and Revolution Since 1945

David P. Chandler (1993)

- account of contemporary Cambodian history focusing on historic figures and their actions up to 1975; policy descriptions and personal testimonies used to examine post-1975 Cambodia

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



INTERNATIONAL DYNAMICS



Kampuchea Between China and Vietnam

Pao-Min Chang (1986)

- thorough analysis of regional dynamics focusing primarily on Chinese and Viet relations vis-a-vis each other and Cambodia from the late 60s to early 80s

Khmer-Viet Relations and the Third Indochina Conflict

Thu-Huong Nguyen-Vo (1992)

- revealing, detailed discussion of the historic relationship between Cambodia and Vietnam



Sideshow : Kissinger, Nixon, and the Destruction of Cambodia

William Shawcross (1987)

- excellent documentation of personnel and events that lead to the rise of the KR and destruction of Cambodia during the late 60s and early to mid-70s



Western Responses to Human Rights Abuses in Cambodia, 1975-80

Jamie Frederic Metzl (1996)

- discussion of responses by the western press, govts, and int'l organizations to events in Cambodia under the KR regime, detailing issues of credibility and how liberals and conservatives clashed on whether or not to believe "the worst"



Why Vietnam Invaded Cambodia : Political Culture and the Causes of War

Stephen J. Morris (1999)

- study of both domestic rational behind and international dynamics leading to Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KHMER ROUGE



Brother Enemy : The War After the War

Nayan Chanda (1986)



Brother Number One : A Political Biography of Pol Pot

David P. Chandler (1999)



Cambodia : Report from a Stricken Land

Henry Kamm (1999)



Cambodia : A Shattered Society

Marie Alexandrine Martin, Mark W. McLeod (Translator) (1994)





Cambodia 1975-1978 : Rendezvous With Death

Karl D. Jackson(Editor) (1992)



The Cambodian Agony

David A. Ablin(Editor), Marlowe Hood (Editor) (1990)



When the War Was over : Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge Revolution

Elizabeth Becker (1998)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



NARRATIVES



A Cambodian Odyssey

Haing Ngor, et al (1991)



Music Through the Dark

Bree Lafreniere, Daran Kravanh (2000)



When Broken Glass Floasts

Chanrithy Him (2000)



Beyond the Killing Fields : Voices of Nine Cambodian Survivors in America

Usha Welaratna (1994)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



MILITARY ACCOUNTS





Lost Crusade : America's Secret Cambodian Mercenaries

Peter Scott (1998)



Road to the Killing Fields : The Cambodian War of 1970-1975

Wilfred P. Deac, Harry G. Summers (1997)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



CONTEMPORARY ISSUES





Cambodia at War

Dinah Pokempner(Editor), et al (1995)

- examination of human right abuses by both KR and govt forces in the mid 90s and the role of foreign support for each side

Cambodia and the International Community: The Quest for Peace, Development, and Democracy

Frederick Brown(Editor), David G. Timberman (1998)

- collection of 8 essays that provide a good overview of conditions in Cambodia during the late 90s; also identifies future prospects and challenges for the country



The Quality of Mercy : Cambodia, Holocaust and Modern Conscience

William Shawcross (1984)

- Cambodia as a case study of humanitarian efforts, exploring the roles and rivalry of different int'l relief agencies, the political context in which they work, and govts they had to work with and around



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



HISTORIC TEXTS





The Customs of Cambodia

Ta-kuan Chou

- description of the Angkor Empire by 13th century Chinese explorer

Travels in Siam, Cambodia, and Laos, 1858-1860

Henri Mouhot

- account of 19th century Southeast Asia by French explorer



Cambodia : Year Zero

Francois Ponchaud

- 1st report of KR atrocities generally believed by int'l public (printed in French 1977, English 1978)



Murder of a Gentle Land : The Untold Story of a Communist Genocide in Cambodia

John Barron

- 1st report of atrocities in Cambodia given wide publicity in America (printed by Reader's Digest 1977)



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTHER INTERESTS

Angkor : Heart of an Asian Empire

Bruno Dagens, Ruth Sharman (Translator) (1995)

- concise but thorough introduction to the ancient city of Angkor and historic archeological expeditions to the temples

Khmer : The Lost Empire of Cambodia

Theirry Zephir (1998)

- colorful little book that gives a nice overview of the Angkorian Empire



Sculpture of Angkor and Ancient Cambodia: Millennium of Glory

Helen Ibbitson Jessup(Editor), et al (1997)

- coffee table book with quality photographs of Khmer sculptures

THE KHMER MENTALITY

(Based on a 1997 translation of the original Khmer text, "Proloeng Khmer," published in 1973)

Author: Professor Sar Sarun (deceased)

Faculty of Arts and Human Sciences

University of Phnom Penh

Editing author: Khmer Aphiwath Group

Publisher: Khmer Aphiwath Group, Melbourne, Australia

Translator: Kua Cham

Further Edited 2003 for the Khmer Institute by Vannareth Lamm and William Snyder
The First Root: MATRIARCHY

A principal component of the Khmer mentality is matriarchy. At all levels of organization within Khmer society, ranging from family life to national government, the accepted leader or decision-maker is a woman.

This pattern dates back to the beginnings of our recorded history. During the Funan Period we had as our monarch a queen known variously as "Soma," "Liev Yi," or "Neang Neak." An Indian prince known as "Kaodinhya" (Indian name), "Hun Tien" (Chinese name), or "Preah Thong" (traditional Khmer name) conquered the nation of Funan and eventually married the Khmer queen. During the wedding the prince followed the queen, and held on to the edge of her scarf so as not to be distracted by his surroundings.

Our Khmer ancestors carved this story into the walls of Angkor to remind us of the ancient origins of our matriarchy. At present-day royal weddings, custom still requires the groom to hold the edge of the bride's scarf. For ordinary people as well, matriarchy is a basic principle of social organization. This can be seen in the titles of important positions, in educational maxims, and in common social beliefs.

A) Within the family, female titles normally precede male ones:
"mother and father"
"grandmother and grandfather"
"aunt and uncle"

B) In the armed forces, important titles include:
"mother of the army" (army chief)
"mother of the command" (commander)
"deputy mother of the command" (deputy commander)

C) Government titles include:
"mother of the commune" (commune leader)
"mother of the town" (mayor)
"mother of the district" (district councilor)
"mother of the block" (block representative for a group of ten households)

D) An educational maxim:
"It is better to face a shipwreck than to have the house burn down." (meaning: it is better to lose the father than the mother, because the father is less important.)

E) Some common social beliefs can be expressed as follows:
Clean husband + Corrupt wife = Corrupt
Bribe-free husband + Bribed wife = Bribed
Husband's disapproval + Wife's approval = Approval
The wife is the chief of the family, while the husband seeks work outside the home in order to bring money back to her. If the sum is less than expected, his wife may chastise him. Khmer wives have the personality of "master-wife." In contrast, in Chinese society the husband controls the family's finances, and Chinese wives have the personality of "slave-wife."
The Second Root: HIDDEN STRENGTH
According to current research into our national history, a second element of the Khmer mentality is a "hidden strength," which has kept the nation from perishing despite repeated attacks from the outside world. We are now asking ourselves, "What is this hidden strength?"
Many academics, as well as other citizens who are concerned with the nation's future integrity, are now searching for the source of this defensive power. Historical research tells us that the Khmer nation has repeatedly been invaded. In some of these periods the Khmer were enslaved by the Thai. The successive Khmer capitals of Angkor and Longvek were subjected to terrible devastation. The great sages and scholars were taken prisoner and sent to serve in the invaders' country. How have the Khmer land and the Khmer people survived to the present day?

These case studies show that the Khmer have a hidden quality of persistence, which gives them defensive strength and keeps the Khmer nation from falling. For this reason our ancestors created the popular proverb, "The Khmer territories will never perish." The very fact that they had the confidence to say this clearly indicates the strength contained in the Khmer mentality. Yet, we no longer know the exact nature of this essential, hidden strength, nor exactly where it resides in the Khmer identity.

Only when we find this hidden part of the Khmer spirit can we continue to protect our land and our nation from danger. Until then, we will have no reason to believe the optimistic proverb mentioned above. The Khmer spirit and identity are tightly intertwined with our culture and civilization.

The Third Root: SELF-PRAISE
The third element of the Khmer mentality, based ultimately on considerations of geography, lies in the fact that the Khmer have considerable pride, and have a strong inclination to praise themselves. This is because the Khmer people originally belonged to an ethnic family known as the Mon-Khmer, which inhabited the entire peninsula of Indochina. At that time the region was called Sovanna Phum ('Golden Country'), and shared a border with China.

The name comes from the Pali words sovann, meaning 'gold', and phum, meaning 'land' or 'country'. People living in the Golden Country of Sovanna Phum led joyful lives, blessed with natural riches, and in their unconscious mind there slowly developed a high level of pride, as well as a tendency to boast. The inhabitants of Sovanna Phum belonged to three different ethnic groups: the Mon, the Cham, and the Khmer. They lived in tribal communities, without clear land boundaries, and mainly traded gold with the Portuguese, who traveled by sail in the China Sea.

The people of the Golden Country had no concerns other than the gold trade. This is what gave rise to their boastful attitude, and to the development of a high level of pride. In this respect the Mon ranked first, followed by the Cham and then the Khmer, who were the humblest of the three. Nonetheless, the Khmer were firmly trapped in the same up-bringing, and our Khmer ancestors made this explicit in the following parable:
The Mon take the heavens for their seat.
The Cham raise a single palm to the sky.
The Khmer ascend to the clouds, but then pass through the earthworm's shit.
According to this saying, the self-praise of the Khmer went as high as the clouds, but not so high as the sky or the heavens. Moreover, the Khmer usually came back down to earth quickly: They boasted, but then returned to reality. When the Khmer spoke among themselves, they did not realize that they were boasting, because they shared a common level of pride. But when they spoke with the Cham, who were even prouder, they could see that the Cham liked to boast. Likewise, the Cham did not see themselves as a boastful people, but when they spoke with the Mon, they did notice that the Mon were remarkably fond of boasting.

The Mon boasted more than anyone else, until they lost all their land.
The Cham, second only to the Mon in boasting, lost their land, too.
The Khmer boasted only moderately, and thus retained some of their land.
Yet, by no means should we expect the Khmer to retain their remaining land forever. At present the Khmer nation is headed for catastrophe.
How did boasting cause these three ethnic groups to lose so much of their land? The answer goes something like this. As they continued boasting and enjoying their natural resources, they forgot that the surrounding ethnic groups coveted their land. The Thai, who originated in China's southern province of Yunnan, became known in the Eighth Century when they started to migrate southward. When the Mongolians invaded China in the Thirteenth Century, the Thai took advantage of the resulting chaos and attacked the city of Sukhotey. They took over all the Mon areas, and also conquered a number of northern Khmer provinces beyond the Danrek Mountains, along the Semourn River. These included Nokoreach, Surin, Sangkeas, Kouk-khan, Sisaket, and Burirum. Moreover, they extended their control into southwestern areas, as far as Malaysia. All of this territory had belonged to the Sovanna Phum Peninsula.
Later, in 1794 and 1795, three Khmer aristocrats were competing for state power. Each considered himself superior to the others, because all three belonged to an unconditionally proud people. One of the aristocrats, Ben, tricked another, Sous, into assassinating the third, Mou. Afterwards Ben tried to kill Sous, but failed, because the latter had strong allies. Ben then requested the help of the Thai army, whom he allowed to enter Cambodia. In exchange for their help, Ben let Thailand annex several Khmer provinces, including Battambang, Mongkolburi, and Serisophan.
What led these Khmer aristocrats to fight one another for power? In that day there was an active race for power based on self-proclaimed superiority, with assistance from foreign armies. The aristocrats had placed on the throne a six-year-old prince named Ang Eng, the son of Prince Otey II, who was too young to rule. Their goal was to seize power for themselves.
Thus, we can see from history that foreign invasions of the Khmer territory were possible only because Khmer leaders were stubbornly convinced of their own superiority, and failed to realize that the country was headed for disaster.

The Khmer fondness for boasting is also well-documented, for instance, in such ethical poems as "Father's Testament," "Rules for Children and Grandchildren," "Fable for Children and Grandchildren," and "Conduct Rules for Men." All these writings seek to awaken the Khmer people from their dreams of self-praise and irrational pride.

The following are some examples.

"Father's Testament":

DO NOT BOAST ABOUT YOUR STRENGTH...
"Fable for Children and Grandchildren":

A FROG BOASTS THAT IT CAN FIGHT WITH THE ELEPHANT...

A TOAD BOASTS THAT IT IS AS BEAUTIFUL AS GOLD...

"Rules for Children and Grandchildren":

DO NOT BOAST ABOUT YOUR RANK...

Another example comes from an academic conference held at Chakdhumuk Hall on 9 November 1970, where a Buddhist monk argued that the Khmer language "has excellent linguistic rules that are superior to those of any human language in the world [sic]."
Further discussion of our people's taste for boasting can be found in a recently published book by Mr. Bun Chan Mol, The Character of the Khmer.
The Fourth Root: AGRICULTURE

The fourth element of the Khmer mentality is a link to agriculture. From the beginning, Khmer society relied almost exclusively on agriculture, and eventually it took agriculture as an important source of cultural identity. All aspects of Khmer education have their "roots" in agriculture, because the Khmer have a strong tendency to use agricultural metaphors in explanations.
A) In the family domain:

"WHEN YOU FARM, LOOK AT THE GRASS."

(meaning, when you marry off your children, look at their partners' roots.)

"START FARMING NOW, WHILE THE SOIL IS STILL WARM."

(meaning, start courting the girl now, while your heart is still aflame.)

"TRANSPLANTED RICE-PLANTS BRING ALONG THEIR ORIGINAL SOIL."

(meaning, a wife can elevate her husband.)

B) In the military domain:

"YOU FARM A FIELD WITH WATER."

(meaning, you fight a war with food.)

C) In the domain of national development:

"AGRICULTURE IS THE BREATH OF THE COUNTRY."

D) In education, more generally:

"DROP BY DROP, THE PALM TREE FILLS THE TUBE."
"VERTICAL RICE PLANTS BEAR NOTHING, LEANING ONES BEAR GRAIN."
"HAPPY FARMING AND PLANTING WILL BRING
TRADE, RESPECT, AND A GOOD MEAL.
REAL WEALTH ISN'T HARD TO GET.
THE JOY IS TRUE, BECAUSE IT LASTS."
(from "Father's Testament"; original verse in crow's-walk rhyme)
"THINK ABOUT, AND WORK ON, GROWING RICE
DURING ALL THE SEASONS.

A RICE FIELD SHOULD HAVE A SIGN,
WHILE A FRUIT FARM SHOULD HAVE A FENCE."
(from "Inherited Conduct Rules"; original verse in Bhramngit rhyme)

The Fifth Root: INDIFFERENCE TO RULES

The fifth element of the Khmer mentality, due once again to considerations of geography, is a relative indifference to laws and regulations. Why should this be so? The Khmer region is seldom threatened by the natural disasters found in Japan and Europe:

Freezing winters
Earthquakes
Volcanic eruptions
Savage storms
Typhoons
Large-scale floods
The Khmer territory seldom faces such disasters. Indeed, natural disasters are almost unheard of, aside from minor floods that occur every few decades, and even they are not especially brutal.

The climate is so warm that Khmer people can survive without clothing. The only significant "earthquakes" are caused by bombs dropped by B-52's, which come day and night, destroying both the farmland and the occupants of many villages.

Because the Khmer countryside is rarely subjected to natural catastrophes, the Khmer people are less aware of nature, and have little need to adjust themselves to natural constraints. This exemption from constraints has shaped the Khmer mentality, making it insensitive to social and legal rules except where there is coercion. This stands in contrast to countries in colder regions, where people cannot even survive without appropriate clothing.

Yet, people from those regions who migrate to the Khmer territory eventually adopt a mindset similar to the Khmer people's. Likewise, Khmer people who go to live in colder regions eventually adopt the mindset of the people there. Thus, the fifth element of the Khmer soul is explained by geographical conditions.

The Sixth Root: BEING INACTIVE

The sixth element of the Khmer mentality is inactivity. Because the Khmer people live in the tropics, they tend to avoid physical exertion. The Khmer artistic spirit dwells in a soft, fanciful, and romantic state, one that is low in energy. Khmer music tends to be sentimental, and to make people sleepy.

Khmer people move slowly. They set off for the workplace at a relaxed pace, as if they were on vacation. These factors have shaped the Khmer mentality to prefer people who are inactive rather than active, conservative rather than progressive.

Examples:

The Khmer admire people who work less and earn more, rather than people who work hard and earn little. Likewise, the Khmer admire a government official who simply signs a document and earns millions of riels, rather than one who works from morning till evening and hardly earns enough to survive. In fact they should appreciate the latter, who makes a personal sacrifice and saves money for the national budget. Yet, if an educator and a customs official simultaneously ask to marry a family's daughter, the former will end in despair. Where does this come from?

Indeed, this is the unfairness of society in a tropical country.

Shall we continue with this lifestyle, spoiled by nature? Or shall we try to win out over nature? Shall we destroy this root of the Khmer mentality, or leave it undisturbed? The solution lies mainly in the awareness of Khmer youngsters, but the right awareness will be possible only after education – that is, after enlightenment. If we lack enlightenment, our minds may unconsciously drift in the wrong direction. Being blind or ignorant is a great evil, and allows other people to manipulate us easily.

The authors of Khmer folktales exhibit this aspect of the Khmer mentality in the following ways:
An ignorant man finds two jars of gold hidden in the ground;
A senseless man usually has a wife of excellent quality;
A stupid man is the one likeliest to get sacred powers;
An uneducated man gets promoted to the rank of lord;
Kong Hean is made a Khmer hero by his own shit.
Another example is an old Khmer saying that tells us, "A sage falls into a hole, while a fool rises up to paradise." Shall we retain this root of the Khmer mentality, or cut it off?
The Seventh Root: FUZZINESS ON COMMITMENT
The seventh root of the Khmer mentality is a tendency to be confused about commitments.

This is because the Khmer people live in a country in which the various seasons are not clear-cut: the rainy season and the dry season, as well as the cold season, start and end at fuzzy dates, known to no one. In contrast, countries in colder regions have clear-cut seasons. For example, on the European continent:

Spring is from 21st March to 21st June;
Summer is from 21st June to 22nd September;
Autumn is from 22nd September to 21st December;
Winter is from 21st December to 21st March.
Clear-cut seasons have trained the people of that region to have clear plans:
When they work, they concentrate on working;
When they play, they concentrate on playing;
When they study, they concentrate on studying;
When they eat, they concentrate on eating;
When they rest, they stop all work.
In France it is almost impossible to find a restaurant that serves anything more than drinks before 9AM, or after 10PM. The Khmer region's fuzzy seasons have spoiled the minds of the people living there, with fuzziness in all aspects of commitment:
Work and play are mixed together;
Conflict at work is similar to conflict at home;
Study time and break time are intermingled;
Eating time lasts from morning through the middle of the night, until the sun rises again;
Office tasks and home tasks are mixed together;
A government-owned car is also taken as a personally-owned car, and used to carry the wife, transport the children to school, and even carry the mistress;
Experts at organizing theatrical plays, or at teaching in school, assume ministerial positions in the government (although different people have talents in different areas).

In order to correct this root of the Khmer mentality, it is necessary to impose truly strict laws, and also to have good examples from the top down.
The Eighth Root: EXTREMISM
The eighth element of the Khmer mentality is an ambivalent extremism. Khmer extremist thinking is not always oriented in one particular direction. When we come to like something, we go out of our way to stick to it. But when we start to dislike it, we go far in the opposite direction.

This is reflected in the following popular expressions:
The more loving, the more hating. For example, in the story of "Tum and Teav," Teav's mother initially loved Tum so much that she asked him to become her adopted son. But when she started to dislike him, she sought to have him killed in an extremely violent way.

Teav's mother: "OR-CHOUN, YOU HAVE POWER. WHY NOT USE IT RIGHT NOW? ARREST THAT STUBBORN SHIT TUM. HAVE NO MERCY. ORDER YOUR MEN TO BEAT HIM, STAB HIM, KILL HIM. HIS GUILT IS TOO HEAVY TO BE PARDONED ON EARTH" (original verse in seven-word rhyme)

When we believe people, we believe them a hundred and twenty percent. But if we stop believing, we stop forever.

If you drink, then drink so much that others have to carry you. If you can still walk by yourself, then what was the point in drinking?

, go ahead and taste the flesh.

If you put your hand into the fish paste, go ahead and stick your whole arm in.



If you want to cut someone, go ahead – don't just pretend!







The Ninth Root: HONORING OATHS


The ninth element of the Khmer mentality is the sanctity of one's "truth-word," or oath. Faithfulness to one's word is among the principal Khmer virtues. Examination of Khmer literature indicates that this has been true for a very long time. Some believe that it resulted from contact with Hinduism, for Hindu Brahmans were considered the agents of God, with a mission to spread their religion, and were said to honor their word strictly. Truth to one's word was seen as a major virtue of Hinduism, and indeed as the essence of its theology.

-The essence of the body is chastity.
-The essence of speaking is one's oath.
-The essence of the mind is courage.

We can see this philosophy in the Khmer version of an Indian legend called "Ramayana," where a king named Preah Bat Tusarath does not dare violate his oath. The King has promised a woman named Neang Kaikesi that he will leave his throne to a particular prince, Preah Phirut, if he wins a war with the Sun. In Part One of "Ramayana," the city of Aiyutya is at the center of a conflict over the throne, and the solution is for the King's oath to take priority over tradition. As a consequence, Preah Ream, Preah Laksma, and Neang Sita have to leave the kingdom and live in the forest.

In the story of "A Young Weaver of Palm-leaf Baskets," a personal oath is once again taken as a binding contract. The weaver is stuck at the top of a palm tree, and promises to become a slave to anyone who will save him from falling to his death. A person passing by, riding on an elephant, takes him at his word and initiates a rescue, without asking for any real guarantee of the promise. The elephant rider himself becomes trapped with the weaver. The two make the same promise to four bald men, who again come to their rescue without requiring any real guarantee, because they take the two men's promise as an oath.

In two other folk tales, "A Man and a Tiger" and "A Man and a Crocodile," the main character promises a wild animal that he will come back and be eaten, as soon as he has written his will. In each story, the man keeps his word. Likewise, in "Golden Arrow," a king states that he will kill anyone who interferes with his war plan. When he discovers that his own consort, the Queen, has made this mistake, he bitterly forces himself to keep his word, and executes her with the golden arrow.

To capture the sanctity of one's oath, the Khmer people have formulated the following proverb:

"ONE'S WORD IS AS PRECIOUS TO A HUMAN BEING

AS IVORY IS PRECIOUS TO AN ELEPHANT."

Yet, the sanctity of one's personal oath decreased somewhat after an event known as "the lord's tea-spilling," which first occurred around 1845 under an occupying Vietnamese general, Troeung Minh Yang. One night the general ordered his troops to behead four or five Khmer citizens, in response to an order from the Vietnamese emperor, Ming Mang. The victims' heads were then used to support the boiler for his tea.

This practice, which continued up until the French entered our country, shook the Khmers' spirit to its very core. In response, the Khmer people began to consider "tricky" approaches to problem-solving, as indicated in the following saying:

"CONSIDER THE CURVED ROAD; AVOID THE STRAIGHT PATH."

Yet, the value placed on one's oath persists to this day, and has been inherited in something close to its original form by people in rural and mountainous areas, whose strict adherence to their personal word resembles the practice of an ascetic monk. In mountainous regions, people teach their children that a person who fails to honor an oath cannot live on the mountain.

The Tenth Root: CHASTITY AND PURITY

The tenth element of the Khmer mentality is to place a high value on chastity and purity. Indeed, the Khmer essence is a devotion to chastity, especially in women. Khmer women work incredibly hard to preserve their chastity, including, of course, their physical purity, or virginity. Correspondingly, Khmer men are inclined to accept as "queen" of their heart only a woman of fairly complete chastity, for which bodily purity is a necessary condition.

When a single woman loses her purity, she generally believes that her body has no more worth, having lost its essence. Her life becomes meaningless, and she sometime tries to end it through suicide. This stands in stark contrast to European women, who generally accept the loss of bodily purity as a natural event in their life, and who are more inclined to value the reality of their heart, which they consider the essence of their life.

Khmer people place greater value on the quality of the body, than on the quality of the heart. There are those who believe that this emphasis on bodily essence has its roots in Brahmanism, for the Brahman likewise values bodily essence as a principal quality of Brahmanhood. Yet, we believe that such a transfer of values is possible only when the recipient was, at some level, already thinking along similar lines.

The existence of this value in the Khmer mentality is noted in many works of Khmer literature:

In the story of "Ramayana," when Preah Ream takes refuge in a forest, his wife Neang Sita accompanies him.

In the story of "Preah Vesantar," when Preah Vesantar is exiled to a forest, his wife Neang Metri goes with him.

Some people think that these stories are influenced by Indian thought. Yet, acceptance by one country of another country's influence, whether in beliefs, customs, religion, or ideology, is possible only when the influence is compatible with the accepting country's pre-existing ideas. Hence, we conclude that Khmer women's devotion to chastity existed even before the Indian influence, which simply added new momentum to our own way of thinking, and led to a greater fondness for stories that praise this value.
For example:
In the story of "Tum and Teav," which is a purely Khmer love story, we see the Khmer woman's devotion to chastity clearly in the deeds of Neang Teav. When she learns that her lover Tum has been executed with a knife, she follows him by cutting her own throat with a knife.

In the story of "Sophat," Neang Manyan believes that Sophat has drowned, and follows her sweetheart by drowning herself in a river.

Now, what evidence do we have that this characteristic is invariably present? One piece of evidence comes from the present-day rotation of Khmer soldiers through different locations, which is required by different missions of the armed forces. As the husbands respond to various dangers, the wives follow them and devote themselves to providing support. Despite the challenges to family finances, and the difficulty of constantly changing their habits and lifestyle, Khmer women take this devotion as their highest priority, and thereby preserve their chastity.

6. Tale of Crow and Night Heron becoming Enemies

According to legend, in ancient times all birds had similar white feathers. Only the size and shape of their bodies made them look different from each other. When they flew in the sky, there was no way to tell what kind of birds they were. Because they would be mistaken for one another in this way, all the birds got together for a meeting and consulted with each other saying, "All of us have come together at this time to decide on how we should have different colors so that we are not mistaken for one another." After the meeting went on for a long while, they decided, "Whoever prefers a particular color, go ahead and be that color. Just make sure that your color patterns are different from one another." At that time, all the birds further agreed that Night Heron would be the master artist.

Night Heron drew colors on all the birds in the patterns they desired, until only Crow and Night Heron himself were left. Night Heron asked Crow, "Brother Crow, what color would you like drawn on you?" Crow replied, "I will let you decide, Brother Night Heron, since you are the master artist. My only request is that whatever colors you choose to draw on me, just make sure it is done well and looks good." Night Heron responded, "Uy! If that is the case, I should only draw on you at night. That is when colors are most brilliant. Colors drawn during the day do not look nearly as good. However, Brother Crow, please draw colors on me first, then I will color you afterward."

Crow drew beautiful spots on Night Heron to Night Heron's delight. When the sun set and it became dark, Night Heron called all the crows together and mixed a big pan of charcoal. He dipped cloth into the pan and smeared the crows all over, not leaving even the slightest speck on their bodies uncolored. The next morning, the crows saw that they were all pitch black and became very angry. At the first glimmer of dawn, however, the night herons had all flown away and hid themselves. Together the crows flew thoughout the forest, squawking in anguish, looking for the night herons so that they could peck them to death.

For this reason, night herons forage for food only at night, because if they were to search for food during the day, they might encounter the crows, their mortal enemy who have sworn to kill them. Thus, when the sun rises, the night heron gather together and hide in the forest, something they continue to do to this very day.

5. Tale of Field Water Buffalo and Forest Water Buffalo

In the distant past, there were two water buffalos: one was a field water buffalo, the other a forest water buffalo. These two animals loved each other dearly, sleeping and eating in each other's company without fail. Rabbit knew that these two water buffalos loved each other in such a way and devised a scheme to make them fall into disfavor with one another.


One day Rabbit sought out these two water buffalos and spoke to them saying: "Neh! Brother Water Buffalos, both of you, do not walk and eat together. Be careful that people of the village will see and capture you both and put you to work for them." The water buffalos hearing Rabbit speak thusly became fearful that they should really meet the tragedy described by his words. From that day forward, the two water buffalos would eat apart from each other; but, in being apart, both animals thought about and missed each other dearly since they had kept one another company for so many years.

After a long while, however, both water buffalos began to no longer think about or miss the other. Rabbit, knowing that the two water buffalos were separate and no longer longed for or remembered one another, went to the forest water buffalo and said, "Neh, Forest Water Buffalo! I have heard another water buffalo say that he is extremely strong and powerful. He wants to compete in a test of strength." Forest Water Buffalo became very angry saying, "Yuh! Brother Rabbit, under the sky on this earth there is only I who am strongest. Now, where is this water buffalo who recklessly brags that he is stronger and more powerful than me. Brother, go beckon him to come here so that we may engage in a test of strength." Rabbit then went to tell the field water buffalo, "Neh, Brother Field Water Buffalo! Forest Water Buffalo is very angry with you. He says to bring you to him so that you may compete in a test of strength to determine who is mightier." Rabbit climbed onto Field Water Buffalo's back and took him to meet Forest Water Buffalo.

As soon as they reached the destination, Forest Water Buffalo ferociously lunged at Field Water Buffalo. Both water buffalos battled each other for an extremely long time, neither winning nor losing. Finally, they both gave up and parted ways: one remained in the field, the other retired to the forest, never to meet each other again to this day.

4. Tale of Crocodile and the Oxcart Driver

There was once a crocodile whose home was in a large pond. When the dry season arrived, however, the water of that pond completely dried up. The crocodile could no longer live there, so he rose onto dry land in search of water.

As the crocodile was crossing the road, an old man driving an oxcart came by and encountered him. Crocodile asked if he could ride on the old man's cart. The oxcart driver asked, "Where are you going, sir?" Crocodile told him, "I have no home because the pond where I use to live is now completely dry. I can no longer live there. Therefore, I am desperately seeking any pond, lake, or river with water in order to make a new home. Have pity for me, Grandfather, please take me to a place that has water and drop me off there."

Grandfather agreed and proceeded to unhitch his oxen from their yoke and lifted Crocodile stretched out onto the cart. Fearing he might fall off, however, Crocodile asked the oxcart driver to tie him to the cart with some rope. Grandfather honored the request and afterward harnessed his oxen and continued on his way. When they arrived at a pond that had water, Grandfather stopped the oxcart, unhitched his oxen, and untied Crocodile. "This pond has plenty of water," said Grandfather. "Go sir, make your new home in this pond."

A crocodile by nature is an ungrateful beast that does not appreciate the generosity of others. Add to this Crocodile's hunger from not having eaten for many days, he therefore spoke saying, "Grandfather, you tied me onto the cart causing me much suffering and misery. You must therefore give me an ox to eat, and only then will you be free of your guilt. If you do not give me an ox, I will have to eat you instead."

Grandfather, hearing Crocodile speak thusly, became very frightened and responded, "Neh Crocodile! I have done you a favor, having taken you to this place. Now you want to eat me, even though I have done you no wrong worthy of such a consequence. Since I do not agree to your terms, wait while I fetch a judge to have him help decide our current dispute, and then we can act on his decision." Crocodile agreed saying, "Sure, Grandfather, go quickly and find a judge while I wait right here."

Grandfather took with him one ripe banana as he set off to find a judge. Along the way he encountered a rabbit standing on a mound. Rabbit, glimpsing Grandfather walking across the forest toward him with a banana in his hand, went ahead and asked, "Grandfather, oh Grandfather, you have tearful eyes that express great regret. What kind of guilt or suffering do you have, come and tell me?"

Grandfather spoke of his conflict with Crocodile, telling Rabbit all the details of their interaction.

After listening to the story, Rabbit said, "Yes, that crocodile is an animal that did not appreciate your generosity. If I should agree to act as judge in deciding your case, you will not have to worry Grandfather. Let me first eat that banana, then we shall be on our way."

Grandfather gave Rabbit his banana. After Rabbit finished eating it, they both walked to the place where Crocodile was waiting. Upon arriving Rabbit spoke out saying, "Well, Mr. Crocodile, you had lost your way when Grandfather took pity on you and gave you a ride in his cart. Now that you have arrived at a very suitable home, what makes you think you have been harmed and should retaliate by eating him? How is he to blame for your suffering, sir?"

Crocodile responded, "Yes, oh wise one, it is true this old man gave me a ride to this place; however, he has inflicted much pain upon me by tying me too tightly to the oxcart where I could not even move or breath. In this way, he has caused me great suffering. That is why I am angry with him and demand he give me one of his oxen to eat, and if he does not agree to that, then I must eat him instead."

Rabbit replied authoritatively, "Oh Grandfather! You have tie him tightly beyond reason, that is why he is angry. Why did you tie him so tightly that he could not even move?"

Grandfather said, "No! I did not tie him too tightly, your honor. I tied him only just tightly enough that he would not fall off the cart."

Rabbit said, "Uh! The accuser says that he was tied too tightly. The accused says that he tied him just tightly enough. Both of these statements cannot be corroborated by any kind of evidence. Therefore, Mr. Crocodile, you must crawl back onto the oxcart so that Grandfather may tie you once again. In this way, we will be able to see whether you were tied tightly or loosely. Only in this way may we arrive at justice."

Crocodile, being an ignorant creature, agreed to climb onto the oxcart and let Grandfather tie him down. As before, Grandfather tied him to the oxcart with a rope. Rabbit asked, "Well, sir, did Grandfather tie you down this tightly?" Crocodile answered, "No, sir! When he tied me before, it was much tighter than this. If he only tied me this much, I would have no reason to be angry with him." Rabbit said, "Okay, tighten it some more Grandfather until he is satisfied." So Grandfather tightened it some more. Rabbit asked, "Well, sir! Now is it tight like before?" Crocodile said, "Not yet! It is not as tight as before yet." Rabbit instructed, "Grandfather, go chop some wood so that you may use it as a twisting device to help you tighten the ropes even further." Grandfather did as Rabbit instructed and tightened the ropes with all his might. Crocodile endured the tightening to the point where he could barely breath then stated, "I beg of you, when he tied me before, he tied me this tightly. Oh lord, no one could tolerate this. Please, sir, witness this and decide who is right and who is in the wrong."

Rabbit, seeing that Crocodile could not move, instructed the oxcart driver saying, "Grandfather, what are you waiting for? Take that large axe in your cart and split his head with it. Why allow such a creature to live? Do not have pity for an animal that does not feel gratitude for the generosity others have done it." Grandfather followed Rabbit's suggestion, grabbed his axe and chopped Crocodile to pieces. He ended the life of that crocodile who lived by treachery.

Wise Rabbit advised, "You should smoke his tail and use it to make soup or simply eat it plain. His stomach and other innards taste very good when eaten right away, Grandfather." The oxcart driver acted as Rabbit suggested in every detail, and gave Rabbit some bananas and cucumbers for helping him avoid a tragic ending. Then he hitched his ox to the cart, bid farewell to Judge Rabbit, and started off for home.